Skip to content

Sample Journal Review Essay

How To Write An Article Review

An article review essay is a critical analysis or evaluation of literature in a given field through making summary of the article in question, comparison or classification. In case it is a scientific article being reviewed, the writer will be required to use database searches to retrieve the results of the search. It is from the searches the writer chooses the article which is appropriate. It is a common skill that is developed in school, to help the students to establish analytical skills. It means the skills are not just used in the classrooms, but also applies in the work environment. Writing an article review has over time proved to be a difficult assignment for most of the students. The fact that it involves the critical evaluation of the ideas that have been presented in the article, means it is not just a summary. For most of the students, an article review is confused with an article summary. The critical analysis of the ideas in the article means, the author has to go further than summarizing the content of the article.

Content of this article

  1. Purposes
  2. Guide for writing
  3. Writing process
  4. Sample

1. Purposes of an Article Review

  • The purpose of the article review essay is associated with the writer summarizing the content of the article, evaluating other literature content and then adding their own understanding of the content.
  • In most of the cases the article to be reviewed is going to be difficult to understand which requires the writer to read it severally before they are able to understand, which then means they will be in a position to offer insights into the content of the article in the review essay.
  • One of the major aspects to understand, in reference to the purpose of article reviews essays writing, is a professional writing skill. This is relative to, article review requires one to have in-depth knowledge of a certain field, from which the article belongs.
  • It is this information that helps in the review of the article and helps the audience to better understand the content and the argument of the writer.
  • The purpose of an article review is associated with values that the people attach to opinion from others about certain information in a given field.
  • It is also a crucial skill for journalists as they have to gather information on a given topic and to further assess how the audience view their work.
  • Overall, article reviews build on the skills of the students to become better at analyzing information that interact with and make professional evaluations and recommendations.

2. Step-by-step guide on article review writing

2.1 First Read

The first part of the article review writing process is reading the article to be reviewed for the first time. The first time helps the writer to understand what it is the article is actually talking about. If it is an assigned reading in class, the student may not have come across the article in the past and thus will need to familiarize themselves with the content and the style of the author. The first reading of the article is crucial, as it helps the reader to connect with the author of the article to be reviewed. This also means that the reader will have to take note of the key points of the author, the basic argument presented in the article and note down some of the words, phrases and concepts that are new. These are elements that will then be looked at before going into the next reading. After noting the new information, the reader is supposed to look up the meaning of the phrases, words and read up on the concepts that have been presented in the article. The information on the various words, phrases and concepts can be found online or even at the library. It helps with better understanding the article and information presented especially if the article is in an unfamiliar field. This also sets the premises for reviewing the article in question, given it is not possible to write a review of an article that one does not understand.

2.2 Close Read

This is the followed by a close reading, which is associated with critical reading of the article. In this case the, reader is not just reading to understand but to also form an opinion of the presentation of the information, the style of the author, the ease of understanding the information resented and even an opinion on the accuracy of the information presented. As such, the close reading is associated with analytical skills of the student. The writer is supposed to take notes of the various aspects of the article that they are going to include in the article review essay. It is crucial as it makes the work or writing the review much easier, relative to collated information that is then sorted out for inclusion in the essay.

2.3 Identify Ideas

After identify the main ideas in the article, the writer may now develop the essay using their own words.

2.4 Present a Unique Article Review

The point behind an article review essay to develop the skills to analyze information gathered from the various sources and presenting in a unique manner that reflects the ideas of the essay and presented in a manner that also shows the opinion of the writer. The writer has to be in a position to present the ideas in a professional manner, showing in depth understanding of the information found on the essay.

3. Article review writing process

The first part of the article review essay is the title, which informs the readers what the essay is about. The title is supposed to be short and precise, giving all the information that the reader may need to understand what the essay is about. At the same time, the title is supposed to be catchy, such that it gets the readers interested. For example, the title may be phrased as follows: “Evaluating the rise home grown terrorism”.

This is then followed by the correct citation of the article to be reviewed. Ideally it does not only give credit to the author of the article to reviewed, but also gives the readers a chance to check out the article that is being reviewed. It is crucial, as some of the readers may want to first read the article under review or may want to compare and make opinions of their own other than what is established in the review essay. In an example the reference to an article home terrorism may be cited as follows:

Park, S. (2016). Counter-Terrorism in France : Home-Grown Terrorism and the Change of Counter-Terrorism Policy. The Journal Of Peace Studies, 17(3), 117-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.14363/kaps.2016.17.3.117.

Within the text of the essay, however the writer will acknowledge the work of the author as follows (Park, 2016).

When identifying the article, it is crucial that the writer selects an article that talks about a topic that they are familiar with. This will help them to better analyze the article as they have some background information. Choosing an article that the writer is not familiar with, will further complicate the analysis process. If for example the writer chooses an article on calculous and they are not familiar with the field, they will have difficult time analyzing the same and may actually distort the meaning presented in the article.

The introduction of the article review essay should be catchy and inform the readers about the topic that they are going to discuss. This is then followed by the introduction of the article to be reviewed, with close reference to the main ideas and arguments presented by the author. The writer then introduces the author of the article and where the information is available, the credentials of the author and some of their other works. If for example the author of the article is a senior lecturer at the local university and working with local antiterror agency, this should be brought to the attention of the readers as it builds on the credibility and authority of the information presented in the article.

The critique section of the essay is organized into three main parts, the introduction of the field in which the article belongs and the wide issues. This is then followed by the article content and later on the review of the ideas and concepts of the article according to the writer. This means that, this is content that has to be unique to the writer. If for example, the writer do not agree with the strategies of reducing home terrorism, they may state so in this section and support their argument with facts.

In the conclusion, the writer summarizes the main points of the article and also connect the same wit their opinion on the matter.

3.1 Proofreading

To make sure the article review essay is professional, the writer has to read through it and make all the necessary corrections such as grammatical errors.

4. Sample of article review

Chris K.
Research Critique 1

       Jamber, E. A., & Zhang, J .J. (1997).  Investigating leadership, gender, and coaching level using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale. Journal of Sport Behavior, 20, 313-322.
 

       The purpose of the study was to determine possible differences in leadership behaviors,

using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS), between male and female coaches 

and among different coaching levels.  The researchers submitted two hypotheses.  The first 

hypothesis was that male and female coaches would respond differently to the RLSS in 

overall leadership behaviors.  The second hypothesis was that differences on the RLSS 

would occur among coaching levels: junior high, high school, and college.

     The sample was nonrandom, including 162 coaches that were chosen on a volunteer 

basis.  Within the sample, 118 (0.73) of the coaches were male, while 44 (0.27) were 

female.  With regard to coaching level, 25 (0.15) were junior high coaches, 99 (0.61) high 

school, and 38 (0.24) at the college level.   While this is a good sample size, the problem lies 

with the distribution of the sample.  The sample number for junior high coaches, in particular, 

is rather low.  A larger sample with regard to all categories would have aided in the data 

analysis, particularly when looking for possible interactions between gender and coaching 

level. 



     The instrument utilized was the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS) developed 

by Zhang, Jensen, and Mann in 1996.  This scale is used to measure six leadership 

behaviors:  training and instruction, democratic, autocratic, social support, positive feedback, 

and situational consideration.  The scale uses 60 statements, which were preceded by “In 

coaching, I:” A Likert scale was then given for each statement: 1 = never; 2 = seldom; 3 = 

occasionally; 4 = often; and 5 = always.  This produced an ordinal level data set.  Scales 

were administered in a number of environmental settings: classrooms, gymnasiums, practice 

fields, and offices.  The internal consistency for each section was calculated: 0.84 for training 

and instruction; 0.66 for democratic; 0.70 for autocratic; 0.52 for social support; 0.78 for 

positive feedback; and 0.69 for situational consideration.  There was no information, 

however, regarding the validity of the RLSS. 

     A MANOVA was used to analyze the data for differences between male and female 

coaches with regard to leadership behaviors.  This is not consistent with the type of data 

collected.  The RLSS used a Likert scale (ordinal), yet a MANOVA would be most 

applicable for normally distributed, quantitative data.  The analysis showed there were no 

significant differences between male and female coaches in overall leadership behaviors. 

When the six leadership styles were examined separately, there was a significant difference 

in social support between males and females.  In general, females scored much higher than 

did the male coaches.



       A MANOVA was also used to examine the data for differences between the three 

levels of coaching (junior high, high school, and college) with regard to leadership behavior 

in general.  There were significant differences between the three levels.  When breaking 

down the six behaviors and examining them individually, an ANOVA was used to analyze 

the data.  Again, because the data for the RLSS is ordinal, an ANOVA is not the best 

analysis tool.   The three coaching levels scored differently on three of the six behaviors: 

democratic behaviors, training and instruction, and social support. High school coaches 

scored much higher than college level coaches in democratic behavior.  Junior high coaches 

were significantly lower in training and instruction than either high school or college coaches. 

Junior high coaches also demonstrated a lesser degree of social support than either the high 

school or college coaches.

     A MANOVA was again used to analyze the data for any interaction between gender and 

coaching level with regard to overall leadership behavior.  Once again, a better analysis 

method could have been chosen based on the nature of the data collected. The results 

indicated no significant interactions. 

      The ecological generaliziability for the study is fairly high.  The surveys were mailed out, 

and returned on a volunteer basis.  However,  due to the nonrandom nature of the sample, 

the results would not generalizable beyond the 162 participants in the study. There was no 

effect size is listed for the study. 

      In order to reduce threats to internal validity, the participants were asked to respond 

honestly and confidentiality was stressed so that the “coaches might feel more at ease in 

responding.”   No other efforts were indicated. 



      The researchers mention that the scales were given in a variety of settings.  This could 

present a threat to the internal validity in that participants might not have been entirely 

focused on completing the scale, but instead on coordinating practice, completing 

paperwork, etc.  There are a number of other factors that could effect the internal validity of 

the study, yet were not addressed by the researchers. Coaching experience would greatly 

effect the responses of the participants, yet this was not considered in the study.  The gender 

of the athletes may be a contributing factor to the coaches’ responses.  It is not unreasonable 

to suppose that coaches of female athletes, particularly at the junior high and high school 

levels, will demonstrate more social support than those of male athletes. The nature of the 

sport could also be critical.  Certain coaching styles are more applicable for individual sports 

(wrestling, track, and tennis) than for team sports (football, soccer, and basketball).  The 

socioeconomics and population of the school itself could play a factor.  Certain schools have 

better athletes and programs in a particular sport, while others may not be able to field a 

winning team.  In addition, at the high school level, coaches are occasionally asked/forced to 

work with a program they have no knowledge of or desire to coach due to staffing 

shortages.  This could dramatically influence a coach’s response to the scale questions. The 

history of the program as well as the individual coach’s personal coaching history could 

greatly influence responses.  If the program has had several losing seasons in a row, perhaps 

the attitude of the coach could be different than that of a coach who has recently won a state 

title. 



     An additional set of questions regarding the personal history of the coach in question 

could have helped reduce many of these threats.  With additional information, the 

researchers may have been able to use a modified matching system when analyzing the 

results.  By increasing the number of independent variables to include things such as 

coaching experience and gender of the athletes, the researchers could have reduced some of 

the potential threats to internal validity.  In addition, bringing coaches together to a common 

setting could have reduced location threat.  Coaches meet seasonally for clinics.  Perhaps 

obtaining permission to administer the survey during these meetings would have been 

possible. It would have also been possible to actually go to individual schools and meet with 

the coaches as a group to administer surveys.  This method would have given a good 

cross-section of gender and coaching experience for a variety of sports. 

     While the study has merit, the methods need to be re-evaluated.  The power of the study 

needs to be increased by obtaining a larger sample size.  The numerous potential threats to 

internal validity need to be addressed and minimized where possible.  It would also be 

helpful to be given data regarding the validity of the RLSS.  Without these, it is impossible to 

evaluate the potential meaningfulness of this study.